Knihobot

In Defence of Organisation Theory

A Reply to the Critics

Více o knize

This book provides a concise, clear survey and defence of organizational theory. That theory and its associated research has in recent years become subject to strong criticism. Rival perspectives on organizations have been put forward. One of these stresses that organizations need to be understood as made up of individual people. Another asserts the need to see organizations as part of the conflicts and radical struggles in society. These alternative views have led to a host of critiques of conventional organization studies. It is attacked as being tautological, philosophically naive, ideological, and managerially biased. To date there has been no substantial reply to these criticisms by a protagonist of organization theory. This volume uniquely fills that gap. In part one the author examines and rebuts each of the major lines of criticism. In part two the rival approaches suggested by the critics are themselves subjected to an analysis of their limitations. The book concludes with a new model of organizational design which provides a synthesis of previous research.

Nákup knihy

In Defence of Organisation Theory, Lex Donaldson

Jazyk
Rok vydání
1985
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(měkká)
Jakmile se objeví, pošleme e-mail.

Doručení

Platební metody

Nikdo zatím neohodnotil.Ohodnotit

Titul
In Defence of Organisation Theory
Podtitul
A Reply to the Critics
Jazyk
anglicky
Vydavatel
CUP Archive
Rok vydání
1985
Vazba
měkká
Počet stran
206
ISBN10
0521315395
ISBN13
9780521315395
Série
Anotace
This book provides a concise, clear survey and defence of organizational theory. That theory and its associated research has in recent years become subject to strong criticism. Rival perspectives on organizations have been put forward. One of these stresses that organizations need to be understood as made up of individual people. Another asserts the need to see organizations as part of the conflicts and radical struggles in society. These alternative views have led to a host of critiques of conventional organization studies. It is attacked as being tautological, philosophically naive, ideological, and managerially biased. To date there has been no substantial reply to these criticisms by a protagonist of organization theory. This volume uniquely fills that gap. In part one the author examines and rebuts each of the major lines of criticism. In part two the rival approaches suggested by the critics are themselves subjected to an analysis of their limitations. The book concludes with a new model of organizational design which provides a synthesis of previous research.