Naomi Oreskes Pořadí knih

The bestselling authors of Merchants of Doubt offer a profound, startling history of one of America’s most tenacious—and destructive—false ideas: the “magic of the marketplace.”

A story about a witch named Lazar who takes her pet pig, Crikky, to a farm to meet some animals. At the farm they meet some chickens, a sheep, a horse, a dog, and another pig.

"Mars and its secrets have fascinated and mystified humans since ancient times. Its vivid color and visibility to the naked eye, its geologic kinship with Earth, its potential as our best hope for settlement-Mars embodies everything that inspires us about space and space exploration. In this book, National Air and Space Museum Curator Matthew Shindell captures the majesty of the red planet and the work done by people on Earth to explore it. He connects our current period of human exploration of Mars to the work done through the centuries and across cultures by asking how the quest to understand Mars has shaped our knowledge of ourselves, our own planet, our solar system, and beyond. For the Love of Mars reveals why Mars has piqued scientists' interest for centuries. It brings to light how difficult and sometimes flawed martian discoveries could be for earth-bound planetary explorers and, by focusing on the human stories behind the telescopes and behind the robots we have come to know and love, shows how Mars exploration became more sophisticated through the years in ways that helped expand knowledge about other facets of space and the universe. A must read for everyone curious about Curiosity and the Red Planet"-- Provided by publisher

"Do doctors really know what they are talking about when they tell us vaccines are safe? Should we take climate experts at their word when they warn us about the perils of global warming? Why should we trust science when our own politicians don't? In this landmark book, Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength--and the greatest reason we can trust it. Tracing the history and philosophy of science from the late nineteenth century to today, Oreskes explains that, contrary to popular belief, there is no single scientific method. Rather, the trustworthiness of scientific claims derives from the social process by which they are rigorously vetted. This process is not perfect -- nothing ever is when humans are involved--but she draws vital lessons from cases where scientists got it wrong. Oreskes shows how consensus is a crucial indicator of when a scientific matter has been settled, and when the knowledge produced is likely to be trustworthy."-- Provided by publisher

Naomi Oreskes y Erik M. Conway cuentan la historia de cómo un grupo de científicos y asesores científicos de alto nivel, con profundas conexiones en el mundo de la política y de la industria, realizaron campañas efectivas para engañar al público y negar verdades científicas comprobadas a lo largo de cuatro décadas. Sorprendentemente, los mismos nombres aparecen repetidamente: son las mismas personas las que afirman que la ciencia del calentamiento global «no está resuelta», niegan la verdad de los estudios que relacionan el hábito de fumar con el cáncer de pulmón, el humo de carbón con la lluvia ácida, y los gases clorofluorocarbonos (CFC) con el agujero de la capa de ozono. «La duda es nuestro producto», escribía hace tiempo un famoso ejecutivo del tabaco. Y son estos «expertos» quienes las han suministrado incansablemente. Los autores de "Mercaderes de la duda" sacan a la luz este oscuro rincón de la comunidad científica estadounidense, para mostrarnos de manera irrefutable cómo la ideología y los intereses corporativos, ayudados por unos medios de comunicación demasiado obedientes, han sesgado sistemáticamente la comprensión pública de algunos de los problemas más acuciantes de nuestra era.

Píše se rok 2393 a svět je zcela jiný, než byl na počátku třetího tisíciletí. Jasná varování před klimatickou katastrofou byla po desetiletí ponechána bez povšimnutí, což vedlo ke všeobecné ekologické, sociální, politické i kulturní katastrofě, která je známa jako Velký kolaps z roku 2093. Toho roku růst teploty, zvýšení hladiny moří, šíření sucha a nakonec rozpad západoantarktického ledového štítu dovršily krizi, jež vedla k masové migraci a naprosté proměně světového řádu. Historikové a esejisté Naomi Oreskesová a Eric M. Conway nám v tomto působivém a provokativním sci-fi příběhu a zároveň filosofujícím eseji představují svět zdevastovaný klimatickými změnami. Kniha dramatizuje vědu takovým způsobem, jakým to tradiční literatura faktu nedokáže, a jasně ukazuje důležitost vědců a jejich práce a současně odhaluje prospěchářské zájmy „uhlíkového komplexu“ (stoupenců ekonomiky založené na spalování fosilních paliv ap.), jehož představitelé vědeckou praxi v nejvyšší míře zpolitizovali. Tato kniha je založena na důkladném studiu a poskytuje čtenářům vítanou a originální inspiraci v otázkách klimatických změn a jejich politického (ne)řešení.

The U.S. scientific community has long led the world in research on such areas as public health, environmental science, and issues affecting quality of life. Our scientists have produced landmark studies on the dangers of DDT, tobacco smoke, acid rain, and global warming. But at the same time, a small yet potent subset of this community leads the world in vehement denial of these dangers. Merchants of Doubt tells the story of how a loose-knit group of high-level scientists and scientific advisers, with deep connections in politics and industry, ran effective campaigns to mislead the public and deny well-established scientific knowledge over four decades. Remarkably, the same individuals surface repeatedly - some of the same figures who have claimed that the science of global warming is "not settled" denied the truth of studies linking smoking to lung cancer, coal smoke to acid rain, and CFCs to the ozone hole. "Doubt is our product," wrote one tobacco executive. These 'experts' supplied it. Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway, historians of science, roll back the rug on this dark corner of the American scientific community, showing how ideology and corporate interests, aided by a too-compliant media, have skewed public understanding of some of the most pressing issues of our era.