Nina E. Livesey Knihy

The book presents a compelling argument for reclassifying the seven letters traditionally attributed to Paul as pseudonymous. Nina E. Livesey posits that these letters were crafted by authors who utilized the letter genre for its rhetorical advantages to advance specific disciplinary teachings. She further posits that these letters likely emerged in the mid-second century, challenging long-held assumptions about their authenticity and authorship.

The book offers a comparative analysis of rhetorical strategies employed by Demosthenes, Cicero, and the Apostle Paul, focusing on techniques like hyperbole, rebuke, and irony. Through this examination, Livesey delves into the complexities of Paul's letter to the Galatians, revealing its nuanced ambiguities and challenging oversimplified interpretations of his ties to Judaism.

Through a detailed evaluation of treatments of circumcision in the primary authors of the second century BCE to the first century CE, Nina E. Livesey demonstrates that there is no common or universally recognized meaning for the Jewish rite of circumcision. The meaning of circumcision is contingent upon its literary context. The strength of this volume is in its detailed textual analysis of circumcision, attending to the nuances within each text's treatment of circumcision. At the same time, it provides ample evidence of each author's unrestricted use of the rite of circumcision. Ancient authors employed the term freely and in a number of literary senses, as a literal rite, in a metaphoric sense, and as a metonym to confer meanings on this rite. A final chapter provides a brief history of the interpretation of circumcision within the Christian tradition shedding light on its understanding from the second century to the present era.