Onora O'Neill Knihy

This book offers an answer to the question: who ought to do what, and for whom, if global justice is to progress?

The book explores the challenges of reconciling Kant's ethical writings with contemporary views on rationality, actions, and rights. It critically examines the perceived inconsistencies in Kant's philosophy, shedding light on the complexities of his ethical framework and its relevance to modern ethical discussions. Through this analysis, the author aims to clarify misunderstandings and provide insights into Kant's moral philosophy.

The book presents a compelling argument for a nuanced understanding of justice that incorporates the significance of boundaries, institutions, and the diversity of human experiences. It explores how these elements interact and shape our perceptions of fairness, advocating for a model of justice that is inclusive and reflective of varied societal contexts. Through this lens, the author challenges traditional notions of justice, urging readers to consider the complexities of human relationships and the structures that govern them.

This book is a collection of essays by Onora O'Neill and forms an illuminating commentary of Kant's fundamental philosophical strategy.

Although abstract principles alone cannot guide action, they can be combined to shape good practical judgement and change the world.

Focusing on the foundational principles necessary for achieving just institutions and fostering virtuous lives, the book explores ethical frameworks and societal structures that promote fairness and moral integrity. It delves into the relationship between individual actions and broader social outcomes, offering insights into how personal virtues can influence collective justice. Through a thoughtful examination of these concepts, it provides a roadmap for cultivating a more equitable society.

Challenging prevalent notions of individual autonomy in bioethics, this book presents a critical examination of how these ideas shape ethical discussions and decision-making in healthcare. It explores the implications of autonomy on patient rights and the responsibilities of healthcare providers, suggesting alternative frameworks that prioritize relational and contextual factors over strict individualism. Through rigorous analysis, it invites readers to reconsider the foundations of ethical practice in medical settings.

In this 2002 book, Onora O'Neill investigates sources of deception in our society and re-examines questions of press freedom.

'Two things', wrote Kant, 'fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe: the starry heavens above and the moral law within'. Many would argue that since Kant's day, the study of the starry heavens has advanced while ethics has stagnated, and in particular that Kant's ethics offers an empty formalism that tells us nothing about how we should live. In Acting on Principle Onora O'Neill shows that Kantian ethics has practical as well as philosophical importance. First published in 1975, the book is regarded as a classic account and defence of the Kantian ethical position. It addresses Kant's account of reasoning about action, in particular his controversial claim that the Categorical Imperative guides action and is basic to ethics and justice. This second edition offers a substantial new introduction and updated bibliography, and will be valuable for a wide readership in Kant studies and those studying ethics.

Onora O'Neill shows how digital technologies have raised new ethical issues for communication, and argues that ethical communication requires broad attention, not only to rights of freedom of expression, but also to the agency, duties and needs of audiences.