
Parametry
- 99 stránek
- 4 hodiny čtení
Více o knize
In the 1964 book God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion, Norbert Wiener lays down his ideas on machine learning, machine reproduction, and the place of machines in society, against a backdrop of religious references. The provocative title sums up the confrontation of technical, mathematical, and imaginative boldness with cultural prejudice. He mentions concerns such as sensory feedback in artificial limbs, the problems of human responsibility in relation to technology, the limits of machine game-playing, Darwinism, Marxism, the Cold War, the rigidity of ideological thinking, and a critique of economy as a science. In the conclusion, he shifts the burden of ethics to politics, away from religion.
Nákup knihy
God & Golem, Inc., Norbert Wiener
- Jazyk
- Rok vydání
- 1966
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (měkká)
Doručení
Platební metody
Tady nám chybí tvá recenze.
- Titul
- God & Golem, Inc.
- Jazyk
- anglicky
- Autoři
- Norbert Wiener
- Vydavatel
- MIT Press
- Rok vydání
- 1966
- Vazba
- měkká
- Počet stran
- 99
- ISBN10
- 0262730111
- ISBN13
- 9780262730112
- Série
- Štítky
- Naučná literatura, Společenské vědy, Technologie & Průmysl, Duchovní literatura, Psychologická tématika, Filosofická tématika, Náboženská témata, Náboženství, Filosofie, Věda, Technologie, Umělá inteligence
- Hodnocení
- 3,65 z 5
- Anotace
- In the 1964 book God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion, Norbert Wiener lays down his ideas on machine learning, machine reproduction, and the place of machines in society, against a backdrop of religious references. The provocative title sums up the confrontation of technical, mathematical, and imaginative boldness with cultural prejudice. He mentions concerns such as sensory feedback in artificial limbs, the problems of human responsibility in relation to technology, the limits of machine game-playing, Darwinism, Marxism, the Cold War, the rigidity of ideological thinking, and a critique of economy as a science. In the conclusion, he shifts the burden of ethics to politics, away from religion.