Excavating Marx's early writings to rethink the rights of the poor and the idea of the commons in an era of unprecedented privatization The politics of dispossession are everywhere. Troubling developments in intellectual property, genomics, and biotechnology are undermining established concepts of property, while land appropriation and ecological crises reconfigure basic institutions of ownership. In The Dispossessed, Daniel Bensaïd examines Karl Marx's early writings to establish a new framework for addressing the rights of the poor, the idea of the commons, and private property as a social institution. In his series of articles from 1842-43 about Rhineland parliamentary debates over the privatization of public lands and criminalization of poverty under the rubric of the "theft of wood," Marx identified broader anxieties about customary law, property rights, and capitalist efforts to privatize the commons. Bensaïd studies these writings to interrogate how dispossession continues to function today as a key modality of power. Brilliantly tacking between past and present, The Dispossessed discloses continuity and rupture in our relationships to property and, through that, to one another. In addition to Bensaïd's prescient work of political philosophy, The Dispossessed includes new translations of Marx's original "theft of wood" articles and an introductory essay by Robert Nichols that lucidly contextualizes the essays.
Daniel Bensaïd Pořadí knih
Daniel Bensaïd byl francouzský filozof a přední představitel trockistického hnutí. Byl klíčovou postavou studentské revolty v roce 1968 během svého studia na Pařížské univerzitě Nanterre. Jeho práce se hluboce zabývaly teorií a praxí radikální politiky. Bensaïdův filozofický odkaz spočívá v jeho neúnavném zkoumání možností společenské transformace.



- 2021
- 2020
Recorded Fragments
- 210 stránek
- 8 hodin čtení
These interviews with Daniel Bensaïd were broadcast in 2008 ont the radio station Fréquence Paris Plurielle
- 1995
Bensaïd croit que Marx n'a pas élaboré un système doctrinaire mais plutôt une théorie critique de la lutte sociale et du changement du monde. Les trois parties du livre reprennent ses trois grandes critiques: celles de la raison historique, de la raison économique et de la positivité scientifique. [SDM].