Knihobot

Manufacturing Religion

Hodnocení knihy

Více o knize

In this new work, Russell McCutcheon critiques traditional scholarship on religion, targeting several interrelated aspects. He focuses on the History of Religions as a discipline, the contributions of Mircea Eliade, recent studies on Eliade's life and politics, contemporary world religion textbooks, and the notion that "religion" is a sui generis phenomenon. McCutcheon analyzes the ideological foundations of the sui generis argument, revealing its role in shaping the field's object of study into something ahistoric, apolitical, fetishized, and sacrosanct. He argues that this perspective has fostered the creation of departments, jobs, and publication avenues for those who accept this problematic construction, resulting in a disciplinary ethos marked by theoretical naivete and a corresponding body of scholarship. Examining introductory comparative religion textbooks, he finds they uniformly embrace the sui generis viewpoint, which, while popular among intended audiences, undermines critical perspectives and capacities. Furthermore, he asserts that treating religion as an ahistorical category contributes to broader systems of political domination and cultural imperialism.

Nákup knihy

Manufacturing Religion, Russell T. McCutcheon

Jazyk
Rok vydání
2003
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(měkká)
Jakmile se objeví, pošleme e-mail.

Doručení

Platební metody

3,9
Velmi dobrá
30 Hodnocení

Tady nám chybí tvá recenze.

Titul
Manufacturing Religion
Jazyk
anglicky
Rok vydání
2003
Vazba
měkká
Počet stran
268
ISBN10
0195166639
ISBN13
9780195166637
Série
Hodnocení
3,9 z 5
Anotace
In this new work, Russell McCutcheon critiques traditional scholarship on religion, targeting several interrelated aspects. He focuses on the History of Religions as a discipline, the contributions of Mircea Eliade, recent studies on Eliade's life and politics, contemporary world religion textbooks, and the notion that "religion" is a sui generis phenomenon. McCutcheon analyzes the ideological foundations of the sui generis argument, revealing its role in shaping the field's object of study into something ahistoric, apolitical, fetishized, and sacrosanct. He argues that this perspective has fostered the creation of departments, jobs, and publication avenues for those who accept this problematic construction, resulting in a disciplinary ethos marked by theoretical naivete and a corresponding body of scholarship. Examining introductory comparative religion textbooks, he finds they uniformly embrace the sui generis viewpoint, which, while popular among intended audiences, undermines critical perspectives and capacities. Furthermore, he asserts that treating religion as an ahistorical category contributes to broader systems of political domination and cultural imperialism.